Brinkmann Ranch – 500 New Homes – Begins in Frisco

The historic Brinkmann Ranch in frisco

Brinkmann Ranch –  500 New Homes – Begins in Frisco

More Homes to Follow

The sale of a key Frisco property will bring a new neighborhood with hundreds of homes, the first of potentially thousands of new homes to Frisco.  Plano-based homebuilder John Landon said Monday that he has bought part of the 3,500-acre Brinkmann Ranch – one of the largest undeveloped properties in Frisco.   Landon bought about 200 acres on the east side of the ranch on Coit Road.  His Landon Homes plans to begin construction soon on the new neighborhood.   “Landon also has an option to buy more property at Brinkmann Ranch.  The sprawling property located between Preston and Coit roads has for years been one of the most sought after development sites in Collin County.  Owner Baxter Brinkmann has been working with the City of Frisco to plan the property for multiple uses.

-          Dallas Morning News, February 24, 2015

Next Portion of LBJ Freeway (I-635) Dallas, TX Expansion to Open July 12

Next Portion of LBJ Freeway Expansion to Open July 12

The second phase of LBJ Freeway’s massive, $2.7-billion expansion will open July 12, developers announced today. This is the portion that includes LBJ’s interchange with Interstate 35E. If you’ve driven 35E lately, you’ve seen the new lengthy bridges that will be tolled and will connect that thoroughfare with LBJ. The interchange will feature the dynamic toll pricing that goes into effect on LBJ at midnight tonight.

-          Dallas Morning News, June 11, 2014

Energy Boom in Texas is Strong

Energy Boom in Texas is Strong

In Texas, oil and natural gas are synonymous with boom and bust.   A new field or a new technology brings a drilling rush and spectacular wealth.  Then just when nearly everyone has borrowed to the max, the bottom falls out.  Not this time, says John Auers, an oil analyst with Turner,  Mason & Co. engineering consultants in Dallas.   “This is a more sustainable and potentially longer-lasting boom,” he said.  “The early 80s were great times, but they became bad pretty quick.  That will not happen this time.”

-          Dallas Morning News. January 18, 2014

Market Update! For the week of September 30, 2013

Keeping you updated on the market! For the week of  September 30, 2013

---

MARKET RECAP Lower Mortgage Rates Prevail Mortgage rates can be as difficult to forecast as the flight path of a butterfly, but forecast we do. Last week, we said we expected to see the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage fall after the Federal Reserve announced there would be no tapering of quantitative easing. Our forecast was for the rate on the 30-year loan to fall below 4.5%, and possibly trade in the 4.25%-to-4.5% range for the near future. It looks like we got it right. Bankrate.com's latest survey shows the 30-year loan averaged 4.47% nationally. Of course, some local markets didn't see quite that much reduction, while others saw more. But all in all, we are seeing rates lower than we've seen in the past four months. We expect the 30-year loan to hold near today's levels. The fact is that economic growth remains sluggish. The latest and final revision of 2 nd quarter gross domestic product (GDP) shows less growth than expected. The consensus estimate was for GDP to grow at a 2.7% annualized rate, but the final number shows a 2.48% growth rate. Sluggish GDP growth gives the Federal Reserve reason and room to continue buying $40 billion worth of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) each month. In addition, concerns over a looming federal government shutdown, due to political wrangling over the debt ceiling, will keep interest in Treasury notes and bonds high. Investors are also pondering what impact the Affordable Healthcare Act (Obamacare) will have on businesses when it's implemented next month. In short, there's a lot of uncertainty that will keep investors interested in haven securities like Treasury notes and bonds and MBS. Their interest should help hold mortgage rates at these lower levels. To be sure, we see little impetuous for mortgage rates to move much high. But keep an eye on next Friday's employment report. Should that come in stronger than expected, rates could temporarily spike. On the flip side, if the employment report comes in weaker than expected, rates will move lower. The past couple employment reports have disappointed, so it's likely most economists have proffered less-optimistic predictions. Our crystal ball points to job growth meeting or slightly exceeding exceptions. In that case, we could see an uptick in mortgage rates at the end of the week. But with all the other uncertainties baked into the credit markets, we doubt rates would move meaningfully higher. So we see an extended opportunity to take advantage of lower rates. Keep in mind, though, the long-term bias – an eventual tapering and higher inflation – points to higher mortgage rates down the road. The risk, as we've said so often, remains in procrastinating.

Economic Indicator	Release Date and Time	Consensus Estimate	Analysis
Construction Spending (August)	Tues., Oct. 1, 10:00 am, ET	0.6% (Increase)	Important. Gains in residential spending slowed in recent months, but commercial spending is moving higher.
Mortgage Applications	Wed., Oct. 2, 7:00 am, ET	None	Important. Purchase applications jumped to their highest level since July, which points to strength in underlying home sales.
Factory Orders (August)	Thurs., Oct. 3, 10:00 am, ET	0.3% (Increase)	Moderately Important. Orders remain subdued, thus reflecting sluggish economic growth.
Unemployment Situation (September)	Fri., Oct. 4, 8:30 am, ET	Unemployment Rate: 7.3% Payrolls: 180,000 (Increase)	Very Important. Another month of sluggish job growth and low-employment participation ensures continued quantitative easing.

Laws of Economics Still Work Higher prices bring in more supply; more supply leads to lower prices. This is how things are shaping up in the new-home market. Sales jumped 7.9% to an annual rate of 421,000 units in August. The number of new homes for sale rose 6,000 for the month. Supply stands at five months, a considerable improvement over the 4.6-month supply that prevailed a year ago. More supply – more new homes – means pricing pressure. The median new home price slipped 0.7% to $254,600 in August, marking the fourth-consecutive monthly decline. This follows the news on existing-home sales, which showed a slight downtick in the median price to $212,100. Over the past couple months, we've been warning that price appreciation will likely slow. The latest data from the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index support our contention. Case-Shiller's 20-city index shows price growth slowed to 0.6% in July, down from 0.9% in the prior two months. Trends don't last in perpetuity, so a slowdown in price-appreciation was (is) inevitable. Because trends don't last in perpetuity, we pounded the table hard in 2010 and 2011 for buyers to get in the game. We were adamant back then because we expected the downward price trend to soon reverse course, which it did. We expect price-appreciation growth to continue to slow. More supply will come to market, because more sellers will see slowing price growth and will want to capture gains. In turn, their actions will further slow price-appreciation growth. That said, if anyone is waiting for slow-to-no price growth, he or she needs to keep in mind that any money saved on a purchase price could easily be offset by higher financing costs.

Dallas Cowboys to Bring $23.4 Billion to Frisco, Texas

Dallas Cowboys to Bring $23.4 Billion to Frisco

Elizabeth Morris, CEO for Insight Research, recently presented to the Frisco City Council how the Dallas Cowboys mixed use development would impact the region.

Here are the details of the 91 acre project:

• This section alone will add around 400,000 square feet of new commercial space and 50,000 square feet of new restaurant space

• 2 Hotels plan to be developed

• An addition of 4,500 jobs by full development in 12 years which is the year 2026

“The Economic Impact she projected was 23.4 Billion in 30 years!”

She also mentioned that the tax revenue alone will bring the city of Frisco 1.2 Billion in the next 30 years!

JUNE 2013 HOUSING SUMMARY FROM REALTOR.COM

• Homes
• Rentals
• Mortgage
• Find REALTORS®
• Moving
• Advice
• News

For Sale Recently Sold Not for Sale Rentals

Search

• viewing:
• real estate trends

June 2013 Real Estate Data

Released - 7/17/2013 | Source - realtor.com , operated by Move, Inc

Monthly Housing SummaryDownload this month's report

June 2013 data reveals both year-over-year median list prices and month-over-month inventories rose significantly in key California markets (with increases of over 20 percent and over 40 percent respectively). The national increase in median list price remained 5.27 percent higher than a year ago. National median age of inventory increased by just one day (at 80 days) in June, compared to 79 days in May 2013.

Nationally, June 2013 inventories rose by 4.26 percent over May 2013 and median list prices were just 0.45 percent higher than May prices. Despite six consecutive months of steady month-over-month growth, inventories continue to be down by 7.29 percent on a year-over-year basis.

For more information on the monthly real estate trend reports released by realtor.com, please contact communications@realtor.com

Search Ranking		Area / Region	Median List Prices			Total Listings			Median Age of Inventory
Current Month	Previous Month	United States	$199,900	5.27%	0.45%	1,931,713	-7.29%	4.26%	80	-15.79%	1.27%
Jun-13	May-13	City	$	YY	MM	#	YY	MM	#	YY	MM
1	1	Chicago, IL	$209,000	16.76%	4.76%	67,158	-6.93%	10.19%	82	-17.17%	1.23%
2	2	Dallas, TX	$219,900	10.01%	0.00%	16,239	-20.83%	1.10%	47	-28.79%	2.17%
3	3	Detroit, MI	$130,000	31.31%	4.00%	16,069	-25.66%	-0.78%	44	-27.87%	-2.22%
4	4	Philadelphia, PA-NJ(PA)	$235,000	-2.04%	0.04%	29,442	-4.42%	-0.41%	85	-14.14%	6.25%
5	5	Boston-Wrcstr-Lwrnce-Lowll-Brcktn, MA-NH(MA)	$349,900	9.38%	0.00%	18,462	-35.10%	-9.98%	54	-27.03%	20.00%
6	6	Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA	$439,000	29.50%	2.57%	26,853	-4.34%	45.69%	62	-16.22%	12.73%
7	7	Atlanta, GA	$184,900	15.63%	1.87%	42,359	10.90%	2.84%	75	-5.06%	4.17%
8	8	New Haven-Brdgprt-Stmfrd-Dnbry-Wtrbry,CT	$345,000	4.86%	-1.43%	16,929	-11.44%	2.62%	82	-13.68%	9.33%
9	10	Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL	$164,352	14.13%	-0.74%	16,565	-8.58%	-2.79%	76	-22.45%	-5.00%
10	9	Fort Worth-Arlington, TX	$180,000	5.94%	0.07%	8,722	-16.70%	0.81%	52	-22.39%	1.96%
11	11	Orlando, FL	$183,277	15.27%	-0.93%	9,753	-7.73%	-1.11%	61	-20.78%	-8.96%
12	13	Miami, FL	$279,000	7.76%	0.00%	14,251	2.19%	-0.16%	75	-14.77%	1.35%
13	18	Orange County, CA	$565,000	31.70%	2.21%	11,432	-12.89%	51.54%	53	-32.91%	15.22%
14	15	Newark, NJ	$299,900	3.45%	0.00%	11,598	-14.94%	3.53%	81	-21.36%	9.46%
15	16	Hartford, CT	$245,500	2.51%	-1.76%	8,691	-4.79%	3.96%	75	-14.77%	10.29%
16	12	Fort Lauderdale, FL	$189,000	14.55%	2.16%	12,682	-13.79%	-0.49%	68	-24.44%	-5.56%
17	14	Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV(VA)	$410,000	2.76%	-3.32%	14,318	-2.37%	6.57%	58	-7.94%	34.88%
18	17	New York, NY	$379,000	11.80%	1.07%	20,365	-20.27%	-0.15%	88	-12.00%	2.33%
19	19	West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL	$239,000	13.81%	-0.42%	17,370	-14.52%	-2.91%	109	-6.03%	11.22%
20	20	Denver, CO	$295,000	9.30%	1.72%	7,636	-30.14%	2.06%	27	-47.06%	-3.57%
21	23	Cleveland-Lorain-Elyria, OH	$125,000	-3.77%	-3.10%	14,648	-7.60%	5.87%	79	-19.39%	-1.25%
22	26	San Diego, CA	$445,000	21.92%	4.71%	9,302	-17.55%	18.14%	51	-30.14%	4.08%
23	21	Austin-San Marcos, TX	$255,000	6.29%	0.00%	9,535	-13.62%	4.73%	53	-17.19%	8.16%
24	27	Monmouth-Ocean, NJ	$325,000	3.17%	1.59%	11,250	-22.80%	2.33%	83	-21.70%	5.06%
25	29	Phoenix-Mesa, AZ	$234,900	30.50%	-0.04%	16,798	6.15%	5.69%	51	-10.53%	4.08%
26	24	Columbus, OH	$149,900	0.00%	0.00%	12,501	-7.28%	3.18%	71	-18.39%	5.97%
27	28	Riverside-San Bernardino, CA	$249,900	23.10%	2.00%	23,946	13.91%	44.72%	75	-8.54%	11.94%
28	22	Baltimore, MD	$259,900	3.96%	0.93%	15,194	-5.47%	4.08%	79	-8.14%	21.54%
29	32	Oakland, CA	$492,250	36.77%	-0.56%	3,057	-21.21%	12.14%	17	-45.16%	6.25%
30	34	Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, NJ	$325,000	8.33%	1.57%	7,731	-21.94%	2.92%	79	-19.39%	6.76%
31	33	Las Vegas, NV-AZ(NV)	$155,000	24.00%	3.33%	17,480	-20.47%	-0.85%	80	-19.19%	-1.23%
32	31	St. Louis, MO-IL(MO)	$164,900	0.00%	-2.94%	13,427	-17.30%	0.00%	72	-18.18%	-1.37%
33	25	Philadelphia, PA-NJ(NJ)	$184,900	-0.05%	1.32%	12,919	-3.79%	3.14%	107	-6.96%	0.94%
34	30	Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC	$227,500	5.81%	0.66%	11,808	-6.11%	-0.14%	79	-11.24%	8.22%
35	35	San Antonio, TX	$199,532	7.86%	0.77%	8,786	-15.31%	-0.73%	63	-17.11%	-1.56%
36	39	Houston, TX	$199,900	14.23%	0.45%	25,109	-10.13%	1.52%	61	-15.28%	3.39%
37	38	Pittsburgh, PA	$144,900	0.63%	-1.36%	13,546	-6.61%	-0.19%	76	-24.00%	-5.00%
38	36	New Orleans, LA	$175,000	4.48%	0.00%	6,723	-12.56%	0.89%	89	-11.00%	3.49%
39	37	Sacramento, CA	$289,000	34.42%	1.44%	9,305	10.99%	10.60%	52	-21.21%	8.33%
40	40	Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC(NC)	$195,000	11.43%	-1.52%	13,259	-6.06%	0.55%	78	-14.29%	1.30%
41	41	Indianapolis, IN	$139,900	3.71%	0.29%	11,856	-17.13%	-1.22%	65	-20.73%	-2.99%
42	42	Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV(MD)	$297,900	8.33%	-0.67%	10,526	-10.65%	6.21%	70	-12.50%	25.00%
43	43	Jacksonville, FL	$215,000	19.51%	0.05%	8,971	-13.14%	7.42%	76	-27.62%	4.11%
44	46	Portland, ME	$269,000	3.46%	2.38%	5,173	-9.09%	6.16%	82	-18.00%	3.80%
45	45	Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI(MN)	$225,123	13.13%	0.06%	14,471	-12.32%	9.65%	46	-29.23%	-6.12%
46	44	Nashville, TN	$217,500	11.60%	1.21%	11,224	-12.25%	1.39%	59	-20.27%	5.36%
47	47	Ann Arbor, MI	$195,900	15.30%	-0.05%	3,252	-19.88%	2.33%	55	-28.57%	-1.79%
48	48	Oklahoma City, OK	$160,454	4.70%	0.35%	6,888	-12.43%	-1.67%	66	-8.33%	8.20%
49	49	San Francisco, CA	$799,000	14.31%	-3.15%	3,150	-21.70%	3.86%	40	-20.00%	14.29%
50	52	Sarasota-Bradenton, FL	$254,991	6.25%	-1.55%	6,706	-10.92%	-7.52%	89	-21.93%	-3.26%
51	51	Ventura, CA	$499,900	26.65%	2.08%	3,337	-0.63%	43.53%	65	-18.75%	10.17%
52	50	Richmond-Petersburg, VA	$213,273	6.64%	1.56%	6,323	-2.80%	5.63%	67	-15.19%	11.67%
53	55	San Jose, CA	$675,000	25.00%	-0.59%	3,021	-24.78%	11.72%	33	-32.65%	13.79%
54	54	Charleston-North Charleston, SC	$240,000	0.42%	0.00%	7,840	-1.21%	2.86%	102	-15.70%	7.37%
55	53	Louisville, KY-IN(KY)	$154,000	6.28%	2.67%	5,105	-13.02%	2.80%	65	-20.73%	3.17%
56	56	Birmingham, AL	$169,900	0.59%	0.00%	9,332	-8.39%	4.34%	92	-11.54%	0.00%
57	57	Fort Myers-Cape Coral, FL	$229,000	5.53%	-5.37%	9,216	-16.26%	-3.16%	104	-9.57%	-1.89%
58	59	Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC	$169,900	2.97%	0.00%	10,249	-0.09%	2.99%	97	-11.01%	3.19%
59	58	Akron, OH	$122,500	-5.70%	-1.92%	4,514	-3.57%	5.89%	78	-12.36%	-1.27%
60	67	Portland-Vancouver, OR-WA(OR)	$289,900	11.54%	1.72%	7,254	-21.11%	6.13%	53	-28.38%	8.16%
61	63	Fresno, CA	$220,000	22.29%	0.05%	2,290	-8.80%	9.46%	48	-12.73%	-4.00%
62	62	Tulsa, OK	$149,500	-0.07%	-0.27%	4,917	-14.53%	2.37%	61	-14.08%	1.67%
63	65	Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI	$149,900	7.07%	0.00%	5,349	-23.14%	-4.41%	55	-30.38%	-1.79%
64	64	Wilmington-Newark, DE-MD(DE)	$214,900	7.45%	0.00%	3,611	-4.47%	3.20%	81	-15.63%	2.53%
65	61	Kansas City, MO-KS(MO)	$145,000	4.32%	0.10%	8,170	-11.69%	2.84%	72	-16.28%	1.41%
66	60	Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI	$184,450	3.10%	2.47%	9,038	-16.31%	1.44%	68	-33.33%	-1.45%
67	68	Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN(OH)	$144,900	-2.75%	-0.75%	11,169	-6.75%	1.36%	81	-12.90%	2.53%
68	66	Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL	$149,900	15.40%	0.00%	6,113	13.10%	-0.11%	88	-12.87%	0.00%
69	77	Daytona Beach, FL	$179,900	2.80%	0.50%	5,829	-14.03%	0.38%	89	-25.21%	-6.32%
70	73	Kansas City, MO-KS(KS)	$189,900	1.44%	2.26%	4,787	-15.26%	2.77%	58	-23.68%	5.45%
71	70	Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC	$149,900	0.00%	0.00%	10,267	-5.02%	-1.72%	95	-12.04%	6.74%
72	69	Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR	$159,000	-2.45%	2.25%	5,098	6.23%	2.31%	79	-8.14%	1.28%
73	74	Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle, PA	$169,990	-2.86%	-2.81%	5,066	-7.81%	1.69%	95	-12.84%	-3.06%
74	72	Dayton-Springfield, OH	$105,000	0.00%	2.04%	8,264	17.60%	14.06%	80	-10.11%	3.90%
75	75	Knoxville, TN	$174,900	-0.06%	0.00%	10,104	-1.49%	1.53%	95	-12.84%	5.56%
76	76	Memphis, TN-AR-MS(TN)	$152,000	2.36%	1.40%	5,151	-15.39%	0.92%	76	-21.65%	4.11%
77	71	Fort Pierce-Port St. Lucie, FL	$159,900	6.67%	-3.03%	5,529	-11.25%	-0.36%	112	-7.44%	4.67%
78	80	Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA	$389,950	15.03%	0.24%	5,926	-23.17%	7.30%	30	-47.37%	3.45%
79	88	Mobile, AL	$181,350	-8.24%	-1.92%	6,546	-7.08%	-0.12%	107	-15.75%	1.90%
80	89	Wilmington, NC	$245,465	4.90%	2.32%	5,745	-7.90%	1.61%	117	-13.33%	-0.85%
81	86	Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA	$179,000	-0.50%	-0.50%	5,039	-10.26%	2.79%	80	-20.00%	-2.44%
82	82	Baton Rouge, LA	$179,900	5.58%	0.00%	3,595	-8.94%	0.03%	81	-11.96%	3.85%
83	83	Naples, FL	$349,900	2.91%	3.52%	5,523	-23.25%	-10.49%	121	-15.97%	1.68%
84	81	Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY	$139,900	-3.52%	0.00%	3,964	-10.84%	7.28%	58	-20.55%	11.54%
85	85	Fort Wayne, IN	$103,900	-1.05%	1.86%	2,888	-12.72%	3.62%	60	-18.92%	1.69%
86	78	Trenton, NJ	$247,500	-0.96%	1.23%	3,166	-8.39%	3.06%	94	-11.32%	8.05%
87	84	Syracuse, NY	$149,900	-0.07%	0.00%	4,390	-8.92%	5.23%	75	-23.47%	2.74%
88	90	Rochester, NY	$139,900	-6.11%	-3.45%	5,546	-8.44%	3.59%	62	-13.89%	6.90%
89	87	Colorado Springs, CO	$239,900	4.35%	0.09%	5,020	7.17%	4.47%	66	-7.04%	11.86%
90	79	Salt Lake City-Ogden, UT	$225,000	7.30%	2.27%	6,775	-15.54%	7.30%	47	-34.72%	2.17%
91	91	Columbia, SC	$159,000	2.58%	2.58%	5,246	-9.33%	1.39%	91	-9.90%	3.41%
92	98	Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY	$224,900	-9.30%	-0.04%	6,157	-9.31%	4.68%	84	-24.32%	1.20%
93	102	Myrtle Beach, SC	$170,000	6.95%	0.60%	8,404	-3.10%	-0.02%	123	-11.51%	1.65%
94	95	Toledo, OH	$108,500	3.43%	-0.46%	3,741	-14.61%	2.61%	76	-19.15%	2.70%
95	92	Stockton-Lodi, CA	$209,950	31.30%	5.11%	2,324	2.70%	10.19%	53	-15.87%	8.16%
96	101	Peoria-Pekin, IL	$129,500	-4.00%	0.00%	2,133	-12.97%	5.44%	65	-17.72%	-7.14%
97	106	Bakersfield, CA	$175,000	21.53%	3.00%	2,155	-0.51%	12.47%	47	-17.54%	-6.00%
98	96	York, PA	$165,000	0.00%	0.09%	2,857	-6.33%	1.71%	84	-9.68%	5.00%
99	94	Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV(DC)	$465,000	13.29%	-2.11%	2,037	-14.20%	7.44%	51	-12.07%	41.67%
100	93	Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL	$139,900	12.82%	-0.07%	3,129	-8.96%	-2.37%	82	-21.90%	-6.82%
101	97	Reading, PA	$167,000	-7.17%	0.00%	3,650	-8.48%	2.33%	102	-22.14%	-1.92%
102	99	South-SC-RSA	$267,813	-0.81%	-0.77%	6,445	-1.41%	0.99%	150	-8.54%	4.17%
103	103	Boise City, ID	$197,297	12.74%	-0.17%	3,362	-1.35%	7.31%	48	-21.31%	-4.00%
104	105	Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Lompoc, CA	$779,000	22.29%	0.52%	1,134	-22.28%	3.09%	65	-24.42%	8.33%
105	104	Honolulu, HI	$495,000	15.65%	2.06%	2,947	-22.67%	-3.91%	61	-20.78%	3.39%
106	111	Pensacola, FL	$178,900	-0.06%	0.38%	3,686	-2.80%	5.59%	97	-19.17%	2.11%
107	112	Corpus Christi, TX	$175,000	3.55%	0.00%	1,831	-17.19%	-2.19%	82	-18.00%	2.50%
108	113	Charleston, WV	$147,000	-1.93%	0.89%	1,159	-8.67%	3.02%	73	-10.98%	-5.19%
109	100	Madison, WI	$224,900	7.10%	-0.04%	4,002	-9.82%	3.01%	74	-26.00%	10.45%
109	110	Wichita, KS	$134,900	0.30%	0.00%	3,439	-10.21%	2.72%	70	-11.39%	-5.41%
111	115	Boulder-Longmont, CO	$393,000	19.13%	0.80%	2,452	-26.52%	2.55%	46	-31.34%	0.00%
112	107	Central-FL-RSA	$159,900	6.67%	-0.06%	4,260	-7.61%	-2.54%	116	-10.08%	-2.52%
113	109	Jersey City, NJ	$329,000	10.03%	3.13%	2,374	-10.35%	9.75%	66	-23.26%	8.20%
114	108	Des Moines, IA	$167,900	1.82%	-4.00%	3,849	-13.13%	0.92%	62	-21.52%	-1.59%
115	121	Tyler, TX	$178,950	-2.19%	1.88%	1,253	-8.21%	-1.96%	83	-9.78%	5.06%
116	116	Albuquerque, NM	$200,000	0.50%	0.25%	4,620	6.06%	5.48%	66	-12.00%	-1.49%
117	123	Asheville, NC	$250,000	0.04%	0.40%	2,759	-12.91%	-2.47%	100	-13.79%	0.00%
118	119	Shreveport-Bossier City, LA	$182,900	4.57%	-0.60%	2,199	10.78%	0.96%	73	10.61%	2.82%
119	118	Tucson, AZ	$183,000	10.98%	1.72%	5,765	1.30%	-4.88%	74	-10.84%	2.78%
120	120	Spokane, WA	$185,000	-2.12%	0.05%	3,708	-3.44%	4.75%	63	-18.18%	6.78%
121	114	Omaha, NE-IA(NE)	$155,900	-0.32%	-2.38%	3,689	-13.06%	3.86%	49	-22.22%	-2.00%
122	125	Fort Collins-Loveland, CO	$282,700	10.86%	0.96%	2,621	-13.98%	5.56%	58	-26.58%	-3.33%
123	124	Reno, NV	$249,000	24.56%	5.53%	2,512	-24.63%	7.72%	61	-34.41%	-6.15%
124	122	Lexington, KY	$159,900	-3.09%	0.00%	4,498	-5.92%	0.36%	78	-15.22%	0.00%
125	130	Tallahassee, FL	$155,000	1.48%	0.00%	2,185	-6.26%	1.96%	95	-11.21%	-4.04%
126	126	West-AZ-RSA	$269,700	8.31%	-1.93%	2,134	-11.16%	5.75%	80	-20.79%	2.56%
127	127	South Bend, IN	$99,900	-2.73%	0.00%	1,799	-13.92%	2.27%	73	-23.96%	-5.19%
128	129	Springfield, IL	$119,900	-4.00%	1.31%	1,391	9.18%	2.88%	78	8.33%	6.85%
129	132	Macon, GA	$129,000	-2.27%	-0.69%	2,556	-3.58%	3.23%	94	-6.00%	5.62%
130	133	El Paso, TX	$153,000	2.01%	2.03%	3,863	8.60%	1.60%	88	-7.37%	0.00%
131	128	Chattanooga, TN-GA(TN)	$183,000	-1.03%	0.27%	2,909	-1.36%	2.43%	90	-15.09%	2.27%
132	117	Roanoke, VA	$169,900	-2.91%	0.00%	2,116	-1.40%	6.55%	81	-11.96%	10.96%
133	134	Norfolk-Virginia Bch-Newport News, VA-NC(VA)	$229,000	-0.39%	0.66%	11,919	-0.96%	4.76%	81	-14.74%	3.85%
134	131	Columbia, MO	$174,900	3.24%	0.58%	965	-14.60%	-0.92%	61	-16.44%	7.02%
135	135	Gainesville, FL	$154,900	1.31%	0.58%	1,961	-3.97%	2.67%	100	-16.67%	2.04%
136	137	Punta Gorda, FL	$189,000	2.19%	-5.45%	2,462	1.74%	-7.79%	109	-12.80%	-5.22%
137	136	Ocala, FL	$129,000	0.58%	-0.77%	3,531	11.28%	2.47%	104	-11.11%	-0.95%
138	138	Portland-Vancouver, OR-WA(WA)	$269,000	8.95%	3.99%	2,310	-15.97%	5.67%	71	-33.02%	10.94%
139	142	Salem, OR	$214,950	10.29%	2.41%	2,357	-9.31%	3.56%	86	-13.13%	7.50%
140	139	Anchorage, AK	$296,000	4.96%	-2.95%	1,107	-13.04%	13.77%	39	-13.33%	2.63%
141	140	Huntsville, AL	$179,900	-2.49%	0.00%	4,708	5.85%	0.32%	104	4.00%	4.00%
142	143	Santa Fe, NM	$389,900	-2.28%	0.23%	2,084	10.21%	13.82%	106	-23.19%	3.92%
143	144	Iowa City, IA	$210,450	6.29%	0.21%	1,108	-10.36%	-6.97%	74	-19.57%	5.71%
144	141	Fayetteville, NC	$149,000	-0.60%	-0.67%	2,644	2.01%	3.36%	103	1.98%	5.10%
145	145	Cedar Rapids, IA	$144,900	-2.42%	0.00%	1,411	-9.32%	2.25%	67	-16.25%	4.69%
146	146	Pueblo, CO	$148,500	9.27%	-0.93%	1,030	0.78%	5.32%	72	-8.86%	-2.70%