For 11th Straight Year Texas Ranks as Top State to do Business

For 11th Straight Year Texas Ranks as Top State to do Business

CEO Magazine’s 11th annual survey of the “Best States to do Business” was released Friday and Texas topped the rankings for the 11th year in a row.  The news had Texas Governor Greg Abbott on cloud nine, saying the state won’t stop at its top ranking.  “Everything is bigger in Texas, and that includes our business climate,” Abbott said. “Despite being the number one state to do business for 11 consecutive years, Texas will do even more to empower businesses and increase economic expansion. That’s why I’m promoting policies to cut the business franchise tax, further rein in regulatory regimes and elevate our higher education system to bolster our workforce so that Texas keeps creating jobs and opportunity.”  In the rankings, Texas was ahead of Florida, North Carolina, Tennessee and Georgia which rounded out the Top 5. California was once again the worst state for a second year.  The rankings takes into account state GDP, unemployment, domestic migration, state government and state-local tax burden.

-          Dallas Morning News, May 8, 2015

Dallas-Area Home Prices Reach Record

Dallas-Area Home Prices Reach Record

Prices of preowned homes in the Dallas area were up 7.4 percent in the latest Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller Home Price Index.  The gain in September from a year ago was the fourth highest in the country – significantly ahead of the 4.9 percent nationwide increase.  Home price increases nationwide have slowed in recent months, but in the Dallas area, the year-over-year price increases have remained steady.  Charlotte, North Carolina and Dallas continue to have price increases considerably above the national average.   Dallas-area home prices are now 12 percent higher than they were before the recession and at record level in the Case-Shiller index.

-          Dallas Morning News, November 26, 2014

Home Prices Rise by 10.5 Percent Year Over Year in April

CoreLogic Reports Home Prices Rise by 10.5 Percent Year Over Year in April

 

June 03, 2014, Irvine, Calif. –

—––CoreLogic HPI Forecast Indicates National Home Prices Are Expected to Rise by 6.3 Percent from April 2014 to April 2015—

CoreLogic^® (NYSE: CLGX), a leading global property information, analytics and data-enabled services provider, today released its April CoreLogic Home Price Index (HPI®) report. Home prices nationwide, including distressed sales, increased 10.5 percent in April 2014 compared to April 2013. This change represents 26 months of consecutive year-over-year increases in home prices nationally. On a month-over-month basis, home prices nationwide, including distressed sales, increased 2.1 percent in April 2014 compared to March 2014.*

At the state level, including distressed sales, no states posted depreciation in April 2014. Additionally, Colorado, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, North Dakota, South Dakota, Texas and Wyoming all surpassed their previous home price peaks. In all, 23 states and the District of Columbia are at or within 10 percent of their peak home price appreciation.

Excluding distressed sales, home prices nationally increased 8.3 percent in April 2014 compared to April 2013 and 1.1 percent month over month compared to March 2014. Distressed sales include short sales and real estate owned (REO) transactions.

The CoreLogic HPI Forecast indicates that home prices, including distressed sales, are projected to increase 1.0 percent month over month from April 2014 to May 2014 and by 6.3 percent (+/- 1.5 percent)** from April 2014 to April 2015. Excluding distressed sales, home prices are expected to rise 0.8 percent month over month from 1.0 percent month over month from April 2014 to May 2014 and by 5.5 percent (+/- 1.5 percent)** from April 2014 to April 2015. The CoreLogic HPI Forecast is a monthly projection of home prices built on the CoreLogic HPI and other economic variables. Values are derived from state-level forecasts by weighting indices according to the number of owner-occupied households for each state.

“The weakness in home sales that began a few months ago is clearly signaling a slowdown in price appreciation,” said Sam Khater, deputy chief economist for CoreLogic. “The 10.5 percent increase in April, compared to a year earlier, was the slowest rate of appreciation in 14 months.”

“Home prices are continuing to rise as we head into the summer months,” said Anand Nallathambi, president and CEO of CoreLogic. “The purchase market continues to suffer from a dearth of inventory which we expect will continue to drive prices up over the year.”

Highlights as of April 2014:

• Including distressed sales, the five states with the highest home price appreciation were: California (+15.6 percent), Nevada (+14.8 percent), Hawaii (+14.1 percent), Oregon (+11.8 percent) and Michigan (+11.3 percent).
• Excluding distressed sales, the five states with the highest home price appreciation were: Hawaii (+13.0 percent), California (+11.4 percent), Nevada (+11.1 percent), New York (+10.3 percent) and Florida (+10.2 percent).
• Including distressed transactions, the peak-to-current change in the national HPI (from April 2006 to April 2014) was -14.3 percent. Excluding distressed transactions, the peak-to-current change in the HPI for the same period was -10.8 percent.
• Excluding distressed sales, all 50 states and the District of Columbia showed year-over-year home price appreciation in April.
• Including distressed sales, the U.S. has experienced 26 consecutive months of year-over-year increases; however, this is the smallest year-over-year increase since February 2013.
• The five states with the largest peak-to-current declines, including distressed transactions, were: Nevada (-38.6 percent), Florida (-34.5 percent), Arizona (-29.5 percent), Rhode Island (-28.8 percent) and West Virginia (-24.2 percent).
• Ninety-five of the top 100 Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) measured by population showed year-over-year increases in April 2014. The five CBSAs that did not show an increase were: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, Conn.; Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, Wis.; Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, Ark.; Worcester, Mass.-Conn.; New Haven-Milford, Conn.

*March data was revised. Revisions with public records data are standard, and to ensure accuracy, CoreLogic incorporates the newly released public data to provide updated results.

** The forecast accuracy represents a 95-percent statistical confidence interval.

AFFORDABILITY OF U.S. CITIES FOR FIRST TIME HOME BUYERS

New Listings Reaching Normalcy
The increasing amount of new listings over the past 60 days in the DFW Metro market is showing signs that we are reaching a normal market for new listings. However, the huge inventory of buyers well exceed the supply of listings and all indications are that our strong seller’s market will continue for the next two to three years, with a continual increase in home prices. Approximately 18,900 homes came on the market in May 2014, compared to 17,468 new listings in May 2012. That is a healthy 9% increase. It was in May 2012 when the DFW Metro market made a significant correction, with May the last month of a buyer’s market to August 2012 when the region had become a seller’s market.

AFFORDABILITY OF U.S. CITIES FOR FIRST TIME HOME BUYERS
A starter home in San Francisco is $679,800, but in Cleveland it is only $102,100. But it takes a hefty income of
$137,129.55 in San Francisco to purchase the starter home. Dallas now ranks 16th in most expensive housing markets,
a huge change over the last many years when Dallas was always one of the most affordable cities.
CITY
Income Needed
Starter Home
Price Change from 2013
1. San Francisco
$137,129.55
$679,800
14.50%
2. San Diego
$98,534.22
$483,000
17.10%
3. New York City
$89,788.69
$388,900
5.60%
4. Los Angeles
$85,964.88
$406,200
17.60%
5. Boston
$79,820.01
$363,200
9.30%
6. Washington, DC
$78,503.56
$358,900
2.90%
7. Seattle
$73,851.06
$339,900
8.70%
8. Portland
$60,307.71
$271,900
10.30%
9. Denver
$59,892.46
$288,400
10.40%
10. Miami
$59,734.23
$259,000
15.10%
11. Sacramento
$58,113.87
$255,800
22.20%
12. Baltimore
$53,078.51
$224,500
-0.90%
13. Chicago
$52,866.88
$176,900
11%
14. Philadelphia
$50,546.25
$201,800
2.10%
15. Houston
$49,036.60
$184,600
12.80%
16. Dallas
$47,708.77
$174,800
9%
17. Minneapolis
$45,732.39
$188,200
10.30%
18. San Antonio
$44,506.00
$169,300
8%
19. Orlando
$43,243.95
$178,000
18.70%
20. Phoenix
$41,308.74
$194,300
15%
21. Tampa
$36,437.56
$145,000
7.40%
22. Atlanta
$34,183.44
$141,900
23.30%
23. Detroit
$32,250.30
$110,750
35.60%
24. Cincinnati
$31,850.18
$121,700
0.06%
25. St. Louis
$31,275.49
$120,500
8.60%
26. Pittsburgh
$30,177.78
$120,000
-1.80%
27. Cleveland
$29,788.67
$102,100
1.10%

More Home Buyers Are Bringing All-Cash Offers to the Table

More Home Buyers Are Bringing All-Cash Offers to the Table

And more of these buyers are individuals, not the institutional investors who plunged into the housing market in 2012 and 2013.   Wealthy people, foreigners and retirees are transforming markets across the United States with these all-cash deals, helping make up for an alarming shortage of first-time buyers who are struggling to save for a down payment or qualify for a loan, a cause of grave concern about the long-term health of the market and its prospects for a true recovery.  “It’s the investor and the wealthy individual that’s keeping the market alive,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics.  “The wealthy buyers in particular are fully engaged now. The stock market is up and times are good for them.”    But it is a frustrating time for first-time buyers who cannot compete because their offers included financing contingencies, appraisals and inspections.

-          Washington Post, May 26, 2014

What's Trending in Real Estate

What's Trending in Real Estate

These six hot topics are gaining traction.

SEPTEMBER 2013 | BY GRAHAM WOOD

Be sure to stay ahead of the curve.

1. Generation X jumps to the top. Generation X—those ages 33 to 47—made up the largest chunk of home buyers, at 31 percent, between July 2011 and June 2012, according to the National Association of REALTORS®’ “Home Buyer and Seller Generational Trends” report. Generation Y—those 32 and younger—made up the second-largest group, at 28 percent, followed by younger baby boomers (18 percent) and older baby boomers (14 percent).
2. Mobile real estate search. Consumers are taking to their mobile devices in droves for real estate searches. According to online marketing firm The Search Agency, real estate ad clicks on smartphones grew 10.7 percent between the fourth quarter of 2012 and the first quarter of 2013. Tablet ad clicks shot up even higher, increasing 20.2 percent quarter over quarter—and 87 percent year over year. It all goes to show that consumers are becoming far more comfortable searching for real estate on mobile devices.
3. Paperless business. Want to spend more time helping clients and less time dealing with all that paperwork? There’s a plethora of online tools that allow you to file and manage documents electronically, One option is RES.NET. In addition to keeping all his paperwork stored securely online, San Diego sales associate Jesse Zagorsky of SDREOSold likes that it lets him link his profile to all of his transactions. It also allows him to communicate with everyone involved in each transaction. “The system [frees] up my time to spend helping customers,” he says. And don’t forget DocuSign, a program for creating and transmitting documents electronically from any device. (Discounts are available to NAR members through the REALTOR Benefits® Program.)
4. Reversal of fortune in inventory? The complaint is widespread: Housing inventory has been stubbornly low in the past year. Well, perhaps that’s starting to change. The number of listings nationwide ticked up by 4.3 percent to 1.9 million homes on the market in June, according to realtor.com®. That’s the highest monthly jump in a year, and rising home prices could persuade more sellers to throw their homes on the market in the coming months.
5. Drone photography. The use of miniature remote--controlled -helicopters for taking aerial photos and -video of properties is piquing interest among real estate agents. But it’s important to note that this marketing practice currently violates Federal Aviation Authority rules pertaining to the use of drones for commercial purposes. The agency is expected to release proposed rules for such use later this year. Congress has given the FAA until September 2015 to finalize a plan. Six states have put laws on the books restricting the public and private use of drones. NAR recommends that REALTORS® avoid using drones until the FAA has released clearer rules.
6. Micro apartments. In some major metropolitan areas, people are living large in smaller spaces. So-called micro apartments—which are often less than 200 square feet—are becoming popular in San Francisco, New York, Seattle, Boston, Providence, R.I., and Portland, Ore., reports CNN Money. But it’s not only those just-out-of-college grads flocking to these tiny units. In some “micro buildings,” the average tenant is 33 years old and makes less than $35,000 a year, according to Reuters.

Rising home prices in DFW brings influx of new listings

Rising home prices in DFW brings influx of new listings

Dallas-Fort Worth's rising home prices -- reaching double-digit increases year-over-year -- have prompted more homeowners to put their houses on the market.   The North Texas area increased its new listings by 18 percent year-over-year in July to 10,176 listings, after the median home prices rose 14 percent in the same time period. The median home price in Dallas was $192,500. In the U.S., the number of new home listings rose 14 percent, with a median home price of $282,034.  Dallas-Fort Worth area homes sold at an average 98.7 percent of list price, compared with the national average of 99.1 percent of list price, according to the data.  With the new listings and an increase in inventory, home prices will moderate in coming months, but the housing market shows no signs of stopping.

-          Dallas Business Journal, August 12, 2013

Cash Sales Over 40% in 10 Markets

Cash Sales Over 40% in 10 Markets

Home buyers who require financing for their home purchase can struggle to compete against buyers who have offers of all-cash.  Where are all-cash deals are the most prevalent? Cash deals represented 80 percent of home sales in June in Vermont; 58 percent in Nevada; 57 percent in Florida, and 51 percent in New York, according to RealtyTrac. Cash deals represent a very small percentage in Texas, Utah, and New Mexico.  The markets with the most all-cash transactions tend to have a high number of foreclosures and depressed home prices, which attracts investors and private equity firms, according to RealtyTrac.   The following 10 metros had 40 percent or more all-cash deals out of the total home sales in June, according to RealtyTrac:

·         Miami/Ft. Lauderdale: 64%

·         Las Vegas: 62%

·         Tampa, Fla.: 58%

·         Detroit: 56%

·         Orlando: 53%

·         New York: 49%

·         New Orleans: 43%

·         Memphis: 43%

·         Jacksonville, Fla.: 42%

·         Atlanta: 42%

-           CNNMoney, July 25, 2013

JUNE 2013 HOUSING SUMMARY FROM REALTOR.COM

• Homes
• Rentals
• Mortgage
• Find REALTORS®
• Moving
• Advice
• News

For Sale Recently Sold Not for Sale Rentals

Search

• viewing:
• real estate trends

June 2013 Real Estate Data

Released - 7/17/2013 | Source - realtor.com , operated by Move, Inc

Monthly Housing SummaryDownload this month's report

June 2013 data reveals both year-over-year median list prices and month-over-month inventories rose significantly in key California markets (with increases of over 20 percent and over 40 percent respectively). The national increase in median list price remained 5.27 percent higher than a year ago. National median age of inventory increased by just one day (at 80 days) in June, compared to 79 days in May 2013.

Nationally, June 2013 inventories rose by 4.26 percent over May 2013 and median list prices were just 0.45 percent higher than May prices. Despite six consecutive months of steady month-over-month growth, inventories continue to be down by 7.29 percent on a year-over-year basis.

For more information on the monthly real estate trend reports released by realtor.com, please contact communications@realtor.com

Search Ranking		Area / Region	Median List Prices			Total Listings			Median Age of Inventory
Current Month	Previous Month	United States	$199,900	5.27%	0.45%	1,931,713	-7.29%	4.26%	80	-15.79%	1.27%
Jun-13	May-13	City	$	YY	MM	#	YY	MM	#	YY	MM
1	1	Chicago, IL	$209,000	16.76%	4.76%	67,158	-6.93%	10.19%	82	-17.17%	1.23%
2	2	Dallas, TX	$219,900	10.01%	0.00%	16,239	-20.83%	1.10%	47	-28.79%	2.17%
3	3	Detroit, MI	$130,000	31.31%	4.00%	16,069	-25.66%	-0.78%	44	-27.87%	-2.22%
4	4	Philadelphia, PA-NJ(PA)	$235,000	-2.04%	0.04%	29,442	-4.42%	-0.41%	85	-14.14%	6.25%
5	5	Boston-Wrcstr-Lwrnce-Lowll-Brcktn, MA-NH(MA)	$349,900	9.38%	0.00%	18,462	-35.10%	-9.98%	54	-27.03%	20.00%
6	6	Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA	$439,000	29.50%	2.57%	26,853	-4.34%	45.69%	62	-16.22%	12.73%
7	7	Atlanta, GA	$184,900	15.63%	1.87%	42,359	10.90%	2.84%	75	-5.06%	4.17%
8	8	New Haven-Brdgprt-Stmfrd-Dnbry-Wtrbry,CT	$345,000	4.86%	-1.43%	16,929	-11.44%	2.62%	82	-13.68%	9.33%
9	10	Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL	$164,352	14.13%	-0.74%	16,565	-8.58%	-2.79%	76	-22.45%	-5.00%
10	9	Fort Worth-Arlington, TX	$180,000	5.94%	0.07%	8,722	-16.70%	0.81%	52	-22.39%	1.96%
11	11	Orlando, FL	$183,277	15.27%	-0.93%	9,753	-7.73%	-1.11%	61	-20.78%	-8.96%
12	13	Miami, FL	$279,000	7.76%	0.00%	14,251	2.19%	-0.16%	75	-14.77%	1.35%
13	18	Orange County, CA	$565,000	31.70%	2.21%	11,432	-12.89%	51.54%	53	-32.91%	15.22%
14	15	Newark, NJ	$299,900	3.45%	0.00%	11,598	-14.94%	3.53%	81	-21.36%	9.46%
15	16	Hartford, CT	$245,500	2.51%	-1.76%	8,691	-4.79%	3.96%	75	-14.77%	10.29%
16	12	Fort Lauderdale, FL	$189,000	14.55%	2.16%	12,682	-13.79%	-0.49%	68	-24.44%	-5.56%
17	14	Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV(VA)	$410,000	2.76%	-3.32%	14,318	-2.37%	6.57%	58	-7.94%	34.88%
18	17	New York, NY	$379,000	11.80%	1.07%	20,365	-20.27%	-0.15%	88	-12.00%	2.33%
19	19	West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL	$239,000	13.81%	-0.42%	17,370	-14.52%	-2.91%	109	-6.03%	11.22%
20	20	Denver, CO	$295,000	9.30%	1.72%	7,636	-30.14%	2.06%	27	-47.06%	-3.57%
21	23	Cleveland-Lorain-Elyria, OH	$125,000	-3.77%	-3.10%	14,648	-7.60%	5.87%	79	-19.39%	-1.25%
22	26	San Diego, CA	$445,000	21.92%	4.71%	9,302	-17.55%	18.14%	51	-30.14%	4.08%
23	21	Austin-San Marcos, TX	$255,000	6.29%	0.00%	9,535	-13.62%	4.73%	53	-17.19%	8.16%
24	27	Monmouth-Ocean, NJ	$325,000	3.17%	1.59%	11,250	-22.80%	2.33%	83	-21.70%	5.06%
25	29	Phoenix-Mesa, AZ	$234,900	30.50%	-0.04%	16,798	6.15%	5.69%	51	-10.53%	4.08%
26	24	Columbus, OH	$149,900	0.00%	0.00%	12,501	-7.28%	3.18%	71	-18.39%	5.97%
27	28	Riverside-San Bernardino, CA	$249,900	23.10%	2.00%	23,946	13.91%	44.72%	75	-8.54%	11.94%
28	22	Baltimore, MD	$259,900	3.96%	0.93%	15,194	-5.47%	4.08%	79	-8.14%	21.54%
29	32	Oakland, CA	$492,250	36.77%	-0.56%	3,057	-21.21%	12.14%	17	-45.16%	6.25%
30	34	Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, NJ	$325,000	8.33%	1.57%	7,731	-21.94%	2.92%	79	-19.39%	6.76%
31	33	Las Vegas, NV-AZ(NV)	$155,000	24.00%	3.33%	17,480	-20.47%	-0.85%	80	-19.19%	-1.23%
32	31	St. Louis, MO-IL(MO)	$164,900	0.00%	-2.94%	13,427	-17.30%	0.00%	72	-18.18%	-1.37%
33	25	Philadelphia, PA-NJ(NJ)	$184,900	-0.05%	1.32%	12,919	-3.79%	3.14%	107	-6.96%	0.94%
34	30	Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC	$227,500	5.81%	0.66%	11,808	-6.11%	-0.14%	79	-11.24%	8.22%
35	35	San Antonio, TX	$199,532	7.86%	0.77%	8,786	-15.31%	-0.73%	63	-17.11%	-1.56%
36	39	Houston, TX	$199,900	14.23%	0.45%	25,109	-10.13%	1.52%	61	-15.28%	3.39%
37	38	Pittsburgh, PA	$144,900	0.63%	-1.36%	13,546	-6.61%	-0.19%	76	-24.00%	-5.00%
38	36	New Orleans, LA	$175,000	4.48%	0.00%	6,723	-12.56%	0.89%	89	-11.00%	3.49%
39	37	Sacramento, CA	$289,000	34.42%	1.44%	9,305	10.99%	10.60%	52	-21.21%	8.33%
40	40	Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC(NC)	$195,000	11.43%	-1.52%	13,259	-6.06%	0.55%	78	-14.29%	1.30%
41	41	Indianapolis, IN	$139,900	3.71%	0.29%	11,856	-17.13%	-1.22%	65	-20.73%	-2.99%
42	42	Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV(MD)	$297,900	8.33%	-0.67%	10,526	-10.65%	6.21%	70	-12.50%	25.00%
43	43	Jacksonville, FL	$215,000	19.51%	0.05%	8,971	-13.14%	7.42%	76	-27.62%	4.11%
44	46	Portland, ME	$269,000	3.46%	2.38%	5,173	-9.09%	6.16%	82	-18.00%	3.80%
45	45	Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI(MN)	$225,123	13.13%	0.06%	14,471	-12.32%	9.65%	46	-29.23%	-6.12%
46	44	Nashville, TN	$217,500	11.60%	1.21%	11,224	-12.25%	1.39%	59	-20.27%	5.36%
47	47	Ann Arbor, MI	$195,900	15.30%	-0.05%	3,252	-19.88%	2.33%	55	-28.57%	-1.79%
48	48	Oklahoma City, OK	$160,454	4.70%	0.35%	6,888	-12.43%	-1.67%	66	-8.33%	8.20%
49	49	San Francisco, CA	$799,000	14.31%	-3.15%	3,150	-21.70%	3.86%	40	-20.00%	14.29%
50	52	Sarasota-Bradenton, FL	$254,991	6.25%	-1.55%	6,706	-10.92%	-7.52%	89	-21.93%	-3.26%
51	51	Ventura, CA	$499,900	26.65%	2.08%	3,337	-0.63%	43.53%	65	-18.75%	10.17%
52	50	Richmond-Petersburg, VA	$213,273	6.64%	1.56%	6,323	-2.80%	5.63%	67	-15.19%	11.67%
53	55	San Jose, CA	$675,000	25.00%	-0.59%	3,021	-24.78%	11.72%	33	-32.65%	13.79%
54	54	Charleston-North Charleston, SC	$240,000	0.42%	0.00%	7,840	-1.21%	2.86%	102	-15.70%	7.37%
55	53	Louisville, KY-IN(KY)	$154,000	6.28%	2.67%	5,105	-13.02%	2.80%	65	-20.73%	3.17%
56	56	Birmingham, AL	$169,900	0.59%	0.00%	9,332	-8.39%	4.34%	92	-11.54%	0.00%
57	57	Fort Myers-Cape Coral, FL	$229,000	5.53%	-5.37%	9,216	-16.26%	-3.16%	104	-9.57%	-1.89%
58	59	Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC	$169,900	2.97%	0.00%	10,249	-0.09%	2.99%	97	-11.01%	3.19%
59	58	Akron, OH	$122,500	-5.70%	-1.92%	4,514	-3.57%	5.89%	78	-12.36%	-1.27%
60	67	Portland-Vancouver, OR-WA(OR)	$289,900	11.54%	1.72%	7,254	-21.11%	6.13%	53	-28.38%	8.16%
61	63	Fresno, CA	$220,000	22.29%	0.05%	2,290	-8.80%	9.46%	48	-12.73%	-4.00%
62	62	Tulsa, OK	$149,500	-0.07%	-0.27%	4,917	-14.53%	2.37%	61	-14.08%	1.67%
63	65	Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI	$149,900	7.07%	0.00%	5,349	-23.14%	-4.41%	55	-30.38%	-1.79%
64	64	Wilmington-Newark, DE-MD(DE)	$214,900	7.45%	0.00%	3,611	-4.47%	3.20%	81	-15.63%	2.53%
65	61	Kansas City, MO-KS(MO)	$145,000	4.32%	0.10%	8,170	-11.69%	2.84%	72	-16.28%	1.41%
66	60	Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI	$184,450	3.10%	2.47%	9,038	-16.31%	1.44%	68	-33.33%	-1.45%
67	68	Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN(OH)	$144,900	-2.75%	-0.75%	11,169	-6.75%	1.36%	81	-12.90%	2.53%
68	66	Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL	$149,900	15.40%	0.00%	6,113	13.10%	-0.11%	88	-12.87%	0.00%
69	77	Daytona Beach, FL	$179,900	2.80%	0.50%	5,829	-14.03%	0.38%	89	-25.21%	-6.32%
70	73	Kansas City, MO-KS(KS)	$189,900	1.44%	2.26%	4,787	-15.26%	2.77%	58	-23.68%	5.45%
71	70	Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC	$149,900	0.00%	0.00%	10,267	-5.02%	-1.72%	95	-12.04%	6.74%
72	69	Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR	$159,000	-2.45%	2.25%	5,098	6.23%	2.31%	79	-8.14%	1.28%
73	74	Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle, PA	$169,990	-2.86%	-2.81%	5,066	-7.81%	1.69%	95	-12.84%	-3.06%
74	72	Dayton-Springfield, OH	$105,000	0.00%	2.04%	8,264	17.60%	14.06%	80	-10.11%	3.90%
75	75	Knoxville, TN	$174,900	-0.06%	0.00%	10,104	-1.49%	1.53%	95	-12.84%	5.56%
76	76	Memphis, TN-AR-MS(TN)	$152,000	2.36%	1.40%	5,151	-15.39%	0.92%	76	-21.65%	4.11%
77	71	Fort Pierce-Port St. Lucie, FL	$159,900	6.67%	-3.03%	5,529	-11.25%	-0.36%	112	-7.44%	4.67%
78	80	Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA	$389,950	15.03%	0.24%	5,926	-23.17%	7.30%	30	-47.37%	3.45%
79	88	Mobile, AL	$181,350	-8.24%	-1.92%	6,546	-7.08%	-0.12%	107	-15.75%	1.90%
80	89	Wilmington, NC	$245,465	4.90%	2.32%	5,745	-7.90%	1.61%	117	-13.33%	-0.85%
81	86	Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA	$179,000	-0.50%	-0.50%	5,039	-10.26%	2.79%	80	-20.00%	-2.44%
82	82	Baton Rouge, LA	$179,900	5.58%	0.00%	3,595	-8.94%	0.03%	81	-11.96%	3.85%
83	83	Naples, FL	$349,900	2.91%	3.52%	5,523	-23.25%	-10.49%	121	-15.97%	1.68%
84	81	Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY	$139,900	-3.52%	0.00%	3,964	-10.84%	7.28%	58	-20.55%	11.54%
85	85	Fort Wayne, IN	$103,900	-1.05%	1.86%	2,888	-12.72%	3.62%	60	-18.92%	1.69%
86	78	Trenton, NJ	$247,500	-0.96%	1.23%	3,166	-8.39%	3.06%	94	-11.32%	8.05%
87	84	Syracuse, NY	$149,900	-0.07%	0.00%	4,390	-8.92%	5.23%	75	-23.47%	2.74%
88	90	Rochester, NY	$139,900	-6.11%	-3.45%	5,546	-8.44%	3.59%	62	-13.89%	6.90%
89	87	Colorado Springs, CO	$239,900	4.35%	0.09%	5,020	7.17%	4.47%	66	-7.04%	11.86%
90	79	Salt Lake City-Ogden, UT	$225,000	7.30%	2.27%	6,775	-15.54%	7.30%	47	-34.72%	2.17%
91	91	Columbia, SC	$159,000	2.58%	2.58%	5,246	-9.33%	1.39%	91	-9.90%	3.41%
92	98	Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY	$224,900	-9.30%	-0.04%	6,157	-9.31%	4.68%	84	-24.32%	1.20%
93	102	Myrtle Beach, SC	$170,000	6.95%	0.60%	8,404	-3.10%	-0.02%	123	-11.51%	1.65%
94	95	Toledo, OH	$108,500	3.43%	-0.46%	3,741	-14.61%	2.61%	76	-19.15%	2.70%
95	92	Stockton-Lodi, CA	$209,950	31.30%	5.11%	2,324	2.70%	10.19%	53	-15.87%	8.16%
96	101	Peoria-Pekin, IL	$129,500	-4.00%	0.00%	2,133	-12.97%	5.44%	65	-17.72%	-7.14%
97	106	Bakersfield, CA	$175,000	21.53%	3.00%	2,155	-0.51%	12.47%	47	-17.54%	-6.00%
98	96	York, PA	$165,000	0.00%	0.09%	2,857	-6.33%	1.71%	84	-9.68%	5.00%
99	94	Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV(DC)	$465,000	13.29%	-2.11%	2,037	-14.20%	7.44%	51	-12.07%	41.67%
100	93	Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL	$139,900	12.82%	-0.07%	3,129	-8.96%	-2.37%	82	-21.90%	-6.82%
101	97	Reading, PA	$167,000	-7.17%	0.00%	3,650	-8.48%	2.33%	102	-22.14%	-1.92%
102	99	South-SC-RSA	$267,813	-0.81%	-0.77%	6,445	-1.41%	0.99%	150	-8.54%	4.17%
103	103	Boise City, ID	$197,297	12.74%	-0.17%	3,362	-1.35%	7.31%	48	-21.31%	-4.00%
104	105	Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Lompoc, CA	$779,000	22.29%	0.52%	1,134	-22.28%	3.09%	65	-24.42%	8.33%
105	104	Honolulu, HI	$495,000	15.65%	2.06%	2,947	-22.67%	-3.91%	61	-20.78%	3.39%
106	111	Pensacola, FL	$178,900	-0.06%	0.38%	3,686	-2.80%	5.59%	97	-19.17%	2.11%
107	112	Corpus Christi, TX	$175,000	3.55%	0.00%	1,831	-17.19%	-2.19%	82	-18.00%	2.50%
108	113	Charleston, WV	$147,000	-1.93%	0.89%	1,159	-8.67%	3.02%	73	-10.98%	-5.19%
109	100	Madison, WI	$224,900	7.10%	-0.04%	4,002	-9.82%	3.01%	74	-26.00%	10.45%
109	110	Wichita, KS	$134,900	0.30%	0.00%	3,439	-10.21%	2.72%	70	-11.39%	-5.41%
111	115	Boulder-Longmont, CO	$393,000	19.13%	0.80%	2,452	-26.52%	2.55%	46	-31.34%	0.00%
112	107	Central-FL-RSA	$159,900	6.67%	-0.06%	4,260	-7.61%	-2.54%	116	-10.08%	-2.52%
113	109	Jersey City, NJ	$329,000	10.03%	3.13%	2,374	-10.35%	9.75%	66	-23.26%	8.20%
114	108	Des Moines, IA	$167,900	1.82%	-4.00%	3,849	-13.13%	0.92%	62	-21.52%	-1.59%
115	121	Tyler, TX	$178,950	-2.19%	1.88%	1,253	-8.21%	-1.96%	83	-9.78%	5.06%
116	116	Albuquerque, NM	$200,000	0.50%	0.25%	4,620	6.06%	5.48%	66	-12.00%	-1.49%
117	123	Asheville, NC	$250,000	0.04%	0.40%	2,759	-12.91%	-2.47%	100	-13.79%	0.00%
118	119	Shreveport-Bossier City, LA	$182,900	4.57%	-0.60%	2,199	10.78%	0.96%	73	10.61%	2.82%
119	118	Tucson, AZ	$183,000	10.98%	1.72%	5,765	1.30%	-4.88%	74	-10.84%	2.78%
120	120	Spokane, WA	$185,000	-2.12%	0.05%	3,708	-3.44%	4.75%	63	-18.18%	6.78%
121	114	Omaha, NE-IA(NE)	$155,900	-0.32%	-2.38%	3,689	-13.06%	3.86%	49	-22.22%	-2.00%
122	125	Fort Collins-Loveland, CO	$282,700	10.86%	0.96%	2,621	-13.98%	5.56%	58	-26.58%	-3.33%
123	124	Reno, NV	$249,000	24.56%	5.53%	2,512	-24.63%	7.72%	61	-34.41%	-6.15%
124	122	Lexington, KY	$159,900	-3.09%	0.00%	4,498	-5.92%	0.36%	78	-15.22%	0.00%
125	130	Tallahassee, FL	$155,000	1.48%	0.00%	2,185	-6.26%	1.96%	95	-11.21%	-4.04%
126	126	West-AZ-RSA	$269,700	8.31%	-1.93%	2,134	-11.16%	5.75%	80	-20.79%	2.56%
127	127	South Bend, IN	$99,900	-2.73%	0.00%	1,799	-13.92%	2.27%	73	-23.96%	-5.19%
128	129	Springfield, IL	$119,900	-4.00%	1.31%	1,391	9.18%	2.88%	78	8.33%	6.85%
129	132	Macon, GA	$129,000	-2.27%	-0.69%	2,556	-3.58%	3.23%	94	-6.00%	5.62%
130	133	El Paso, TX	$153,000	2.01%	2.03%	3,863	8.60%	1.60%	88	-7.37%	0.00%
131	128	Chattanooga, TN-GA(TN)	$183,000	-1.03%	0.27%	2,909	-1.36%	2.43%	90	-15.09%	2.27%
132	117	Roanoke, VA	$169,900	-2.91%	0.00%	2,116	-1.40%	6.55%	81	-11.96%	10.96%
133	134	Norfolk-Virginia Bch-Newport News, VA-NC(VA)	$229,000	-0.39%	0.66%	11,919	-0.96%	4.76%	81	-14.74%	3.85%
134	131	Columbia, MO	$174,900	3.24%	0.58%	965	-14.60%	-0.92%	61	-16.44%	7.02%
135	135	Gainesville, FL	$154,900	1.31%	0.58%	1,961	-3.97%	2.67%	100	-16.67%	2.04%
136	137	Punta Gorda, FL	$189,000	2.19%	-5.45%	2,462	1.74%	-7.79%	109	-12.80%	-5.22%
137	136	Ocala, FL	$129,000	0.58%	-0.77%	3,531	11.28%	2.47%	104	-11.11%	-0.95%
138	138	Portland-Vancouver, OR-WA(WA)	$269,000	8.95%	3.99%	2,310	-15.97%	5.67%	71	-33.02%	10.94%
139	142	Salem, OR	$214,950	10.29%	2.41%	2,357	-9.31%	3.56%	86	-13.13%	7.50%
140	139	Anchorage, AK	$296,000	4.96%	-2.95%	1,107	-13.04%	13.77%	39	-13.33%	2.63%
141	140	Huntsville, AL	$179,900	-2.49%	0.00%	4,708	5.85%	0.32%	104	4.00%	4.00%
142	143	Santa Fe, NM	$389,900	-2.28%	0.23%	2,084	10.21%	13.82%	106	-23.19%	3.92%
143	144	Iowa City, IA	$210,450	6.29%	0.21%	1,108	-10.36%	-6.97%	74	-19.57%	5.71%
144	141	Fayetteville, NC	$149,000	-0.60%	-0.67%	2,644	2.01%	3.36%	103	1.98%	5.10%
145	145	Cedar Rapids, IA	$144,900	-2.42%	0.00%	1,411	-9.32%	2.25%	67	-16.25%	4.69%
146	146	Pueblo, CO	$148,500	9.27%	-0.93%	1,030	0.78%	5.32%	72	-8.86%	-2.70%