5 Reasons You Need To Hire a Professional

10 of 8,123

 

 

 

3:42 PM (20 hours ago) Buying or Selling a Home? 5 Reasons You Need To Hire a Professional 1. What do you do with all this paperwork? Each state has different regulations regarding the contracts required for a successful sale, and these regulations are constantly changing. A true Real Estate Professional is an expert in their market and can guide you through the stacks of paperwork necessary to make your dream a reality. 2. Ok, so you found your dream house, now what? According to the Orlando Regional REALTOR Association, there are over 230 possible actions that need to take place during every successful real estate transaction. Don’t you want someone who has been there before, who knows what these actions are to make sure that you acquire your dream. 3. Are you a good negotiator? So maybe you’re not convinced that you need an agent to sell your home. However, after looking at the list of parties that you need to be prepared to negotiate with, you’ll realize the value in selecting a Real Estate Professional. From the buyer (who wants the best deal possible), to the home inspection companies, to the appraiser, there are at least 11 different people that you will have to be knowledgeable with and answer to, during the process. 4. What is the home you’re buying/selling really worth? It is important for your home to be priced correctly from the start to attract the right buyers and shorten the time that it’s on the market. You need someone who is not emotionally connected to your home to give you the truth as to your home’s value. According to the National Association of REALTORS, “the typical FSBO home sold for $210,000 compared to $245,000 among agent-assisted home sales.” 5. Do you know what’s really going on in the market? There is so much information out there on the news and the internet about home sales, prices, mortgage rates; how do you know what’s going on specifically in your area? Who do you turn to in order to competitively price your home correctly at the beginning of the selling process? How do you know what to offer on your dream home without paying too much or offending the seller with a low-ball offer? Dave Ramsey, the financial guru advises: “When getting help with money, whether it’s insurance, real estate or investments, you should always look for someone with the heart of a teacher, not the heart of a salesman.” Hiring an agent who has their finger on the pulse of the market will make your buying/selling experience an educated one. You need someone who is going to tell you the truth, not just what they think you want to hear.

Make your house look bigger without removing walls...

Instead of just asking me to help with his kitchen remodel, my friend made me an offer I couldn't refuse: Want to come over and knock down a wall?

While that's one way to make your house feel bigger, it's probably not the best option if you're putting your house on the market. Here are a few easier ways to add a sense of space.

Cut the clutter
Everyone knows they should do this, but few people go far enough. Don't put books and magazines in neat piles-get rid of them. Put knickknacks in storage, and pare down your furniture. It's better to have a few large pieces than several small ones.

Take a walk
Every house has natural paths, from the kitchen to the dining room or from the living room to the bathroom, and these walkways must be clear. You may not mind detouring around a large sectional to get from the TV room to the kitchen, but buyers will think your TV room isn't big enough.

Look around
Related to clear walkways are clear views. Keep tall furniture like bookshelves away from doorways, and pull back the shower curtain to expose the entire bathroom. Don't block any part of windows, sliding glass doors, or French doors.

Pick the right paint
If you plan to repaint some rooms, choose colors that feel cool, such as light blue or light green.

Add light
Not only will light colors create a sense of openness, actual light helps, too. Open curtains or blinds to let in sunlight, and consider adding a lamp to dark corners.

When you're done with these changes, ask for objective feedback from your Texas REALTOR®. He or she will know what buyers will focus on when they enter your house and which rooms might need more work.

DFW-Area Homes Gain $55 billion in Value in 2015

With the big price gains, Dallas-Fort Worth area homes have increased about $55 billion in value this year, according to a new report by Zillow.com.  A just-released study by the Internet home marketing firm estimates that DFW homes are worth $411 billion – up from $356 billion a year ago. That’s a gain of more than 15 percent. Nationwide, Zillow estimates that the U.S. housing stock is worth $28.5 trillion, up from $27.5 trillion at the end of 2014.  “This reminds us of the large role housing plays in the overall economy,” said Zillow Chief Economist Svenja Gudell. “Total home value growth slowed this year, but there was still a significant increase in overall value, and many markets are more valuable than they’ve ever been.  “Americans are spending a lot of money on housing, and that will make affordability an important issue next year.”

-          Dallas Morning News, December 30, 2015

North Texas Median Home Prices Soar Above $200,000

North Texas Median Home Prices Soar Above $200,000

This spring’s scorching home market has propelled median house sales prices in North Texas above $200,000 for the first time.  In April, home sales prices in the area were up 14 percent to a record $207,000.  With the latest gains, the median price of preowned single-family homes sold by real estate agents in North Texas is almost 60 percent higher than it was in January 2010, at the worst of the recession.   And home prices in the area are now more than a third ahead of where they were at the previous peak of the housing market in 2007.  “The average home listing price has also jumped up for homes coming on the market,” said Ted Wilson, a housing analyst with Dallas-based Residential Strategies Inc. “More people are motivated to put their houses on the market at these higher prices.”  The Dallas area now leads the country in year-over-year home price increases, according to the latest national comparison from CoreLogic Inc.  In April, median prices were rising at about three times the long-term average annual growth rate.   April’s substantial increase in home sales prices in North Texas comes as some analysts are warning that residential values in Texas’ major markets are overheating.  A new report by Wall Street analysts Fitch Ratings said that Texas and Dallas-area home prices are 11 percent overvalued.

-          Dallas Morning News, May 8, 2015

A New 39-story Condo High Rise in the Arts District

      

The new 39-story condo next to Museum Tower    David Weekley InTown at 3 Locations

A New 39-story Condo High Rise in the Arts District

A 39-story tower planned for downtown Dallas’ Arts District will contain luxury apartments, artist lofts and retail space at Flora and Olive streets.   Developers will build a 39-story residential tower on one of the last vacant sites in the downtown Dallas Arts District.  The project at Flora and Olive streets is right next door to the Museum Tower and a block south of Klyde Warren Park.    The development will have 370 luxury apartments, 39 artists’ lofts and about 12,000 square feet of ground-floor retail space on the one-acre site between the Nasher Sculpture Center and the Meyerson Symphony Center.  “It’s a dense, urban project,” said Dallas architect Graham Greene, one of the partners in the project. “We took our inspiration from what has been done in New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco in their downtowns.   “It helps complete the Arts District — we have storefront retail all along Flora,” Greene said. “It adds a population of 400 to 500 residents, which is huge.”   Construction begins fourth quarter 2015.

-          Dallas Morning News, February 25, 2015

Top 5 Job Growth Cities in US

“Absolutely Phenomenal”

The Dallas-Fort Worth area added more jobs than any other metropolitan area in 2014, a feat it hadn’t achieved in at least two decades.  D-FW gained 136,900 jobs last year, followed by the New York area with 129,000 jobs, according to data released Wednesday by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Houston area was No. 3, with 120,600 jobs. The figures are not seasonally adjusted.  December was the first time that D-FW has ranked No. 1 in calendar-year net job growth since at least 1990, when the BLS began compiling comparable state and local records. Texas also led the nation in job creation last year, adding 457,900 jobs.  Bud Weinstein, an economist at Southern Methodist University, called D-FW’s 4.4 percent job growth rate last year “absolutely phenomenal.”   The 2014 job growth rates for both D-FW and Houston (4.2 percent) beat the state rate of 4 percent.- Dallas Morning News, February 4, 2015

Dallas Skyline Voted Best in the World

We’re No. 1

Dallas Skyline Voted Best in the World

Eat that, Bid Apple.  Sorry, Chicago.  Dallas is No. 1.    Our fair city just took first place in USA Today’s Best International Skyline reader’s choice poll, coming out ahead of No. 2 Chicago for ultimate bragging rights.  USA Today cited our skyline’s colorful lighting, and pointed out that people flying in to DFW and Love Field airports get a great view at night.  The top 10 finishers: 1) Dallas, 2) Chicago, 3) Rio de Janeiro, 4) Toronto, 5)New York, 6) Washington, D.C., 7) St. Louis, 8) Hong Kong, 9) San Francisco, and 10) Seattle.

-          Dallas Morning News, September 9, 2014

Dallas No Longer in Top 10 for Traffic Congestion

Dallas No Longer in Top 10 for Traffic Congestion

The nation's worst rush-hour traffic can be found, not surprisingly, in Los Angeles. But the No. 2 city is a surprise.   Each year, three organizations produce traffic congestion reports.   The reports estimate the “excess travel time” lost in traffic congestion during morning and evening weekday rush hours.     This excess time is relative to the travel time that would be expected if traffic were free-flowing and there was no congestion.   The Los Angeles metropolitan area notches the worst traffic congestion in all three reports — 44.4 percent excess travel time. The second worst congestion is in Austin, Texas, with 34.5 percent excess travel time.   San Francisco (34.4 percent) is No. 3 and New York (33.4 percent) is No. 4. Both cities have a high population density.   Seattle is No. 5 at 32.4 percent, due in part to the cancellation of some planned freeways.   Rounding out the worst 10 are San Jose, Calif. (32.2 percent); Washington, D.C. (31.3); Boston (29.7); Houston (28.3); and Portland, Ore. (28.2).

-          Newsmax, July 6, 2014

10 Grammar Mistakes Almost Everyone Makes on the Web

10 Grammar Mistakes Almost Everyone Makes on the Web With more of your communications going over the web, you, like other business people, may worry about grammar. You don't want to get nailed by the grammar police or, worse, make a goofy grammatical mistake that goes viral. Here are 10 grammar errors to watch out for as you post and comment.  1. "Fewer" or "less?" Use "fewer" when referring to a lower number, as in: "They have fewer than 100 workers." Use "less" when referring to a smaller amount, as in: "We need to get there in less time." 2. "More than," not "over." When referencing a greater number, use "more than," as in: "We have more than 15 new clients." "Over" is simply incorrect. It indicates a physical position in space, or can mean "instead of," but not "more than." 3. "Affect" or "effect?" Think what these words mean as verbs and you'll use them correctly as nouns. To "affect" something means to influence it. So if you influence something, you will have an "affect" on it. To "effect" something is to cause it. So if it's the result of something, it's an "effect." 4. "Me" or "I?" Always use "me" following a preposition, as in: "for me," "with me," "to me," etc. But people can get tripped up when something else is added. They'll say: "for my company and I" or "to my partners and I." Check yourself by leaving out the other element. You'd never say "for I." 5. "I could care less." People say this to be dismissive, but it's incorrect. If you could care less about something, that literally means you care more about it now than you ultimately might! People forget to include the "not" in the phrase. The correct statement is: "I couldn't care less." 6. "Nauseous" or "nauseated?" "Nauseous" refers to something that's sickening to contemplate, but it's not how a person can feel. The correct expression is: "I feel nauseated." 7. Irregardless. This isn't a word. The word is "regardless." 8. The Oxford comma. This is the name for the last comma in a series of three or more items. It appears before the word "and" or "or" at the end of the list. For example: "The shirt comes in Small, Medium, Large, and Extra Large." You can omit the Oxford comma, but there will be times when the sentence won't make sense. Better to always put the Oxford comma in there. 9. Commas for clarity. Always read your copy out loud to see if you need a comma to make the meaning clear. "Let's eat my friend" is not the same invitation as: "Let's eat, my friend." 10. Quotation marks and punctuation. Punctuation belongs inside quotation marks. The best way to make sure your grammar is correct is to check an authoritative source. PR professionals say two of the best are The Elements of Style and the AP Stylebook. Here's to your continued success with grammatically correct online communications, as you keep putting together your best year ever.... Enjoy a great month!

JUNE 2013 HOUSING SUMMARY FROM REALTOR.COM

• Homes
• Rentals
• Mortgage
• Find REALTORS®
• Moving
• Advice
• News

For Sale Recently Sold Not for Sale Rentals

Search

• viewing:
• real estate trends

June 2013 Real Estate Data

Released - 7/17/2013 | Source - realtor.com , operated by Move, Inc

Monthly Housing SummaryDownload this month's report

June 2013 data reveals both year-over-year median list prices and month-over-month inventories rose significantly in key California markets (with increases of over 20 percent and over 40 percent respectively). The national increase in median list price remained 5.27 percent higher than a year ago. National median age of inventory increased by just one day (at 80 days) in June, compared to 79 days in May 2013.

Nationally, June 2013 inventories rose by 4.26 percent over May 2013 and median list prices were just 0.45 percent higher than May prices. Despite six consecutive months of steady month-over-month growth, inventories continue to be down by 7.29 percent on a year-over-year basis.

For more information on the monthly real estate trend reports released by realtor.com, please contact communications@realtor.com

Search Ranking		Area / Region	Median List Prices			Total Listings			Median Age of Inventory
Current Month	Previous Month	United States	$199,900	5.27%	0.45%	1,931,713	-7.29%	4.26%	80	-15.79%	1.27%
Jun-13	May-13	City	$	YY	MM	#	YY	MM	#	YY	MM
1	1	Chicago, IL	$209,000	16.76%	4.76%	67,158	-6.93%	10.19%	82	-17.17%	1.23%
2	2	Dallas, TX	$219,900	10.01%	0.00%	16,239	-20.83%	1.10%	47	-28.79%	2.17%
3	3	Detroit, MI	$130,000	31.31%	4.00%	16,069	-25.66%	-0.78%	44	-27.87%	-2.22%
4	4	Philadelphia, PA-NJ(PA)	$235,000	-2.04%	0.04%	29,442	-4.42%	-0.41%	85	-14.14%	6.25%
5	5	Boston-Wrcstr-Lwrnce-Lowll-Brcktn, MA-NH(MA)	$349,900	9.38%	0.00%	18,462	-35.10%	-9.98%	54	-27.03%	20.00%
6	6	Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA	$439,000	29.50%	2.57%	26,853	-4.34%	45.69%	62	-16.22%	12.73%
7	7	Atlanta, GA	$184,900	15.63%	1.87%	42,359	10.90%	2.84%	75	-5.06%	4.17%
8	8	New Haven-Brdgprt-Stmfrd-Dnbry-Wtrbry,CT	$345,000	4.86%	-1.43%	16,929	-11.44%	2.62%	82	-13.68%	9.33%
9	10	Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL	$164,352	14.13%	-0.74%	16,565	-8.58%	-2.79%	76	-22.45%	-5.00%
10	9	Fort Worth-Arlington, TX	$180,000	5.94%	0.07%	8,722	-16.70%	0.81%	52	-22.39%	1.96%
11	11	Orlando, FL	$183,277	15.27%	-0.93%	9,753	-7.73%	-1.11%	61	-20.78%	-8.96%
12	13	Miami, FL	$279,000	7.76%	0.00%	14,251	2.19%	-0.16%	75	-14.77%	1.35%
13	18	Orange County, CA	$565,000	31.70%	2.21%	11,432	-12.89%	51.54%	53	-32.91%	15.22%
14	15	Newark, NJ	$299,900	3.45%	0.00%	11,598	-14.94%	3.53%	81	-21.36%	9.46%
15	16	Hartford, CT	$245,500	2.51%	-1.76%	8,691	-4.79%	3.96%	75	-14.77%	10.29%
16	12	Fort Lauderdale, FL	$189,000	14.55%	2.16%	12,682	-13.79%	-0.49%	68	-24.44%	-5.56%
17	14	Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV(VA)	$410,000	2.76%	-3.32%	14,318	-2.37%	6.57%	58	-7.94%	34.88%
18	17	New York, NY	$379,000	11.80%	1.07%	20,365	-20.27%	-0.15%	88	-12.00%	2.33%
19	19	West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL	$239,000	13.81%	-0.42%	17,370	-14.52%	-2.91%	109	-6.03%	11.22%
20	20	Denver, CO	$295,000	9.30%	1.72%	7,636	-30.14%	2.06%	27	-47.06%	-3.57%
21	23	Cleveland-Lorain-Elyria, OH	$125,000	-3.77%	-3.10%	14,648	-7.60%	5.87%	79	-19.39%	-1.25%
22	26	San Diego, CA	$445,000	21.92%	4.71%	9,302	-17.55%	18.14%	51	-30.14%	4.08%
23	21	Austin-San Marcos, TX	$255,000	6.29%	0.00%	9,535	-13.62%	4.73%	53	-17.19%	8.16%
24	27	Monmouth-Ocean, NJ	$325,000	3.17%	1.59%	11,250	-22.80%	2.33%	83	-21.70%	5.06%
25	29	Phoenix-Mesa, AZ	$234,900	30.50%	-0.04%	16,798	6.15%	5.69%	51	-10.53%	4.08%
26	24	Columbus, OH	$149,900	0.00%	0.00%	12,501	-7.28%	3.18%	71	-18.39%	5.97%
27	28	Riverside-San Bernardino, CA	$249,900	23.10%	2.00%	23,946	13.91%	44.72%	75	-8.54%	11.94%
28	22	Baltimore, MD	$259,900	3.96%	0.93%	15,194	-5.47%	4.08%	79	-8.14%	21.54%
29	32	Oakland, CA	$492,250	36.77%	-0.56%	3,057	-21.21%	12.14%	17	-45.16%	6.25%
30	34	Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, NJ	$325,000	8.33%	1.57%	7,731	-21.94%	2.92%	79	-19.39%	6.76%
31	33	Las Vegas, NV-AZ(NV)	$155,000	24.00%	3.33%	17,480	-20.47%	-0.85%	80	-19.19%	-1.23%
32	31	St. Louis, MO-IL(MO)	$164,900	0.00%	-2.94%	13,427	-17.30%	0.00%	72	-18.18%	-1.37%
33	25	Philadelphia, PA-NJ(NJ)	$184,900	-0.05%	1.32%	12,919	-3.79%	3.14%	107	-6.96%	0.94%
34	30	Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC	$227,500	5.81%	0.66%	11,808	-6.11%	-0.14%	79	-11.24%	8.22%
35	35	San Antonio, TX	$199,532	7.86%	0.77%	8,786	-15.31%	-0.73%	63	-17.11%	-1.56%
36	39	Houston, TX	$199,900	14.23%	0.45%	25,109	-10.13%	1.52%	61	-15.28%	3.39%
37	38	Pittsburgh, PA	$144,900	0.63%	-1.36%	13,546	-6.61%	-0.19%	76	-24.00%	-5.00%
38	36	New Orleans, LA	$175,000	4.48%	0.00%	6,723	-12.56%	0.89%	89	-11.00%	3.49%
39	37	Sacramento, CA	$289,000	34.42%	1.44%	9,305	10.99%	10.60%	52	-21.21%	8.33%
40	40	Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC(NC)	$195,000	11.43%	-1.52%	13,259	-6.06%	0.55%	78	-14.29%	1.30%
41	41	Indianapolis, IN	$139,900	3.71%	0.29%	11,856	-17.13%	-1.22%	65	-20.73%	-2.99%
42	42	Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV(MD)	$297,900	8.33%	-0.67%	10,526	-10.65%	6.21%	70	-12.50%	25.00%
43	43	Jacksonville, FL	$215,000	19.51%	0.05%	8,971	-13.14%	7.42%	76	-27.62%	4.11%
44	46	Portland, ME	$269,000	3.46%	2.38%	5,173	-9.09%	6.16%	82	-18.00%	3.80%
45	45	Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI(MN)	$225,123	13.13%	0.06%	14,471	-12.32%	9.65%	46	-29.23%	-6.12%
46	44	Nashville, TN	$217,500	11.60%	1.21%	11,224	-12.25%	1.39%	59	-20.27%	5.36%
47	47	Ann Arbor, MI	$195,900	15.30%	-0.05%	3,252	-19.88%	2.33%	55	-28.57%	-1.79%
48	48	Oklahoma City, OK	$160,454	4.70%	0.35%	6,888	-12.43%	-1.67%	66	-8.33%	8.20%
49	49	San Francisco, CA	$799,000	14.31%	-3.15%	3,150	-21.70%	3.86%	40	-20.00%	14.29%
50	52	Sarasota-Bradenton, FL	$254,991	6.25%	-1.55%	6,706	-10.92%	-7.52%	89	-21.93%	-3.26%
51	51	Ventura, CA	$499,900	26.65%	2.08%	3,337	-0.63%	43.53%	65	-18.75%	10.17%
52	50	Richmond-Petersburg, VA	$213,273	6.64%	1.56%	6,323	-2.80%	5.63%	67	-15.19%	11.67%
53	55	San Jose, CA	$675,000	25.00%	-0.59%	3,021	-24.78%	11.72%	33	-32.65%	13.79%
54	54	Charleston-North Charleston, SC	$240,000	0.42%	0.00%	7,840	-1.21%	2.86%	102	-15.70%	7.37%
55	53	Louisville, KY-IN(KY)	$154,000	6.28%	2.67%	5,105	-13.02%	2.80%	65	-20.73%	3.17%
56	56	Birmingham, AL	$169,900	0.59%	0.00%	9,332	-8.39%	4.34%	92	-11.54%	0.00%
57	57	Fort Myers-Cape Coral, FL	$229,000	5.53%	-5.37%	9,216	-16.26%	-3.16%	104	-9.57%	-1.89%
58	59	Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC	$169,900	2.97%	0.00%	10,249	-0.09%	2.99%	97	-11.01%	3.19%
59	58	Akron, OH	$122,500	-5.70%	-1.92%	4,514	-3.57%	5.89%	78	-12.36%	-1.27%
60	67	Portland-Vancouver, OR-WA(OR)	$289,900	11.54%	1.72%	7,254	-21.11%	6.13%	53	-28.38%	8.16%
61	63	Fresno, CA	$220,000	22.29%	0.05%	2,290	-8.80%	9.46%	48	-12.73%	-4.00%
62	62	Tulsa, OK	$149,500	-0.07%	-0.27%	4,917	-14.53%	2.37%	61	-14.08%	1.67%
63	65	Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI	$149,900	7.07%	0.00%	5,349	-23.14%	-4.41%	55	-30.38%	-1.79%
64	64	Wilmington-Newark, DE-MD(DE)	$214,900	7.45%	0.00%	3,611	-4.47%	3.20%	81	-15.63%	2.53%
65	61	Kansas City, MO-KS(MO)	$145,000	4.32%	0.10%	8,170	-11.69%	2.84%	72	-16.28%	1.41%
66	60	Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI	$184,450	3.10%	2.47%	9,038	-16.31%	1.44%	68	-33.33%	-1.45%
67	68	Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN(OH)	$144,900	-2.75%	-0.75%	11,169	-6.75%	1.36%	81	-12.90%	2.53%
68	66	Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL	$149,900	15.40%	0.00%	6,113	13.10%	-0.11%	88	-12.87%	0.00%
69	77	Daytona Beach, FL	$179,900	2.80%	0.50%	5,829	-14.03%	0.38%	89	-25.21%	-6.32%
70	73	Kansas City, MO-KS(KS)	$189,900	1.44%	2.26%	4,787	-15.26%	2.77%	58	-23.68%	5.45%
71	70	Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC	$149,900	0.00%	0.00%	10,267	-5.02%	-1.72%	95	-12.04%	6.74%
72	69	Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR	$159,000	-2.45%	2.25%	5,098	6.23%	2.31%	79	-8.14%	1.28%
73	74	Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle, PA	$169,990	-2.86%	-2.81%	5,066	-7.81%	1.69%	95	-12.84%	-3.06%
74	72	Dayton-Springfield, OH	$105,000	0.00%	2.04%	8,264	17.60%	14.06%	80	-10.11%	3.90%
75	75	Knoxville, TN	$174,900	-0.06%	0.00%	10,104	-1.49%	1.53%	95	-12.84%	5.56%
76	76	Memphis, TN-AR-MS(TN)	$152,000	2.36%	1.40%	5,151	-15.39%	0.92%	76	-21.65%	4.11%
77	71	Fort Pierce-Port St. Lucie, FL	$159,900	6.67%	-3.03%	5,529	-11.25%	-0.36%	112	-7.44%	4.67%
78	80	Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA	$389,950	15.03%	0.24%	5,926	-23.17%	7.30%	30	-47.37%	3.45%
79	88	Mobile, AL	$181,350	-8.24%	-1.92%	6,546	-7.08%	-0.12%	107	-15.75%	1.90%
80	89	Wilmington, NC	$245,465	4.90%	2.32%	5,745	-7.90%	1.61%	117	-13.33%	-0.85%
81	86	Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA	$179,000	-0.50%	-0.50%	5,039	-10.26%	2.79%	80	-20.00%	-2.44%
82	82	Baton Rouge, LA	$179,900	5.58%	0.00%	3,595	-8.94%	0.03%	81	-11.96%	3.85%
83	83	Naples, FL	$349,900	2.91%	3.52%	5,523	-23.25%	-10.49%	121	-15.97%	1.68%
84	81	Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY	$139,900	-3.52%	0.00%	3,964	-10.84%	7.28%	58	-20.55%	11.54%
85	85	Fort Wayne, IN	$103,900	-1.05%	1.86%	2,888	-12.72%	3.62%	60	-18.92%	1.69%
86	78	Trenton, NJ	$247,500	-0.96%	1.23%	3,166	-8.39%	3.06%	94	-11.32%	8.05%
87	84	Syracuse, NY	$149,900	-0.07%	0.00%	4,390	-8.92%	5.23%	75	-23.47%	2.74%
88	90	Rochester, NY	$139,900	-6.11%	-3.45%	5,546	-8.44%	3.59%	62	-13.89%	6.90%
89	87	Colorado Springs, CO	$239,900	4.35%	0.09%	5,020	7.17%	4.47%	66	-7.04%	11.86%
90	79	Salt Lake City-Ogden, UT	$225,000	7.30%	2.27%	6,775	-15.54%	7.30%	47	-34.72%	2.17%
91	91	Columbia, SC	$159,000	2.58%	2.58%	5,246	-9.33%	1.39%	91	-9.90%	3.41%
92	98	Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY	$224,900	-9.30%	-0.04%	6,157	-9.31%	4.68%	84	-24.32%	1.20%
93	102	Myrtle Beach, SC	$170,000	6.95%	0.60%	8,404	-3.10%	-0.02%	123	-11.51%	1.65%
94	95	Toledo, OH	$108,500	3.43%	-0.46%	3,741	-14.61%	2.61%	76	-19.15%	2.70%
95	92	Stockton-Lodi, CA	$209,950	31.30%	5.11%	2,324	2.70%	10.19%	53	-15.87%	8.16%
96	101	Peoria-Pekin, IL	$129,500	-4.00%	0.00%	2,133	-12.97%	5.44%	65	-17.72%	-7.14%
97	106	Bakersfield, CA	$175,000	21.53%	3.00%	2,155	-0.51%	12.47%	47	-17.54%	-6.00%
98	96	York, PA	$165,000	0.00%	0.09%	2,857	-6.33%	1.71%	84	-9.68%	5.00%
99	94	Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV(DC)	$465,000	13.29%	-2.11%	2,037	-14.20%	7.44%	51	-12.07%	41.67%
100	93	Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL	$139,900	12.82%	-0.07%	3,129	-8.96%	-2.37%	82	-21.90%	-6.82%
101	97	Reading, PA	$167,000	-7.17%	0.00%	3,650	-8.48%	2.33%	102	-22.14%	-1.92%
102	99	South-SC-RSA	$267,813	-0.81%	-0.77%	6,445	-1.41%	0.99%	150	-8.54%	4.17%
103	103	Boise City, ID	$197,297	12.74%	-0.17%	3,362	-1.35%	7.31%	48	-21.31%	-4.00%
104	105	Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Lompoc, CA	$779,000	22.29%	0.52%	1,134	-22.28%	3.09%	65	-24.42%	8.33%
105	104	Honolulu, HI	$495,000	15.65%	2.06%	2,947	-22.67%	-3.91%	61	-20.78%	3.39%
106	111	Pensacola, FL	$178,900	-0.06%	0.38%	3,686	-2.80%	5.59%	97	-19.17%	2.11%
107	112	Corpus Christi, TX	$175,000	3.55%	0.00%	1,831	-17.19%	-2.19%	82	-18.00%	2.50%
108	113	Charleston, WV	$147,000	-1.93%	0.89%	1,159	-8.67%	3.02%	73	-10.98%	-5.19%
109	100	Madison, WI	$224,900	7.10%	-0.04%	4,002	-9.82%	3.01%	74	-26.00%	10.45%
109	110	Wichita, KS	$134,900	0.30%	0.00%	3,439	-10.21%	2.72%	70	-11.39%	-5.41%
111	115	Boulder-Longmont, CO	$393,000	19.13%	0.80%	2,452	-26.52%	2.55%	46	-31.34%	0.00%
112	107	Central-FL-RSA	$159,900	6.67%	-0.06%	4,260	-7.61%	-2.54%	116	-10.08%	-2.52%
113	109	Jersey City, NJ	$329,000	10.03%	3.13%	2,374	-10.35%	9.75%	66	-23.26%	8.20%
114	108	Des Moines, IA	$167,900	1.82%	-4.00%	3,849	-13.13%	0.92%	62	-21.52%	-1.59%
115	121	Tyler, TX	$178,950	-2.19%	1.88%	1,253	-8.21%	-1.96%	83	-9.78%	5.06%
116	116	Albuquerque, NM	$200,000	0.50%	0.25%	4,620	6.06%	5.48%	66	-12.00%	-1.49%
117	123	Asheville, NC	$250,000	0.04%	0.40%	2,759	-12.91%	-2.47%	100	-13.79%	0.00%
118	119	Shreveport-Bossier City, LA	$182,900	4.57%	-0.60%	2,199	10.78%	0.96%	73	10.61%	2.82%
119	118	Tucson, AZ	$183,000	10.98%	1.72%	5,765	1.30%	-4.88%	74	-10.84%	2.78%
120	120	Spokane, WA	$185,000	-2.12%	0.05%	3,708	-3.44%	4.75%	63	-18.18%	6.78%
121	114	Omaha, NE-IA(NE)	$155,900	-0.32%	-2.38%	3,689	-13.06%	3.86%	49	-22.22%	-2.00%
122	125	Fort Collins-Loveland, CO	$282,700	10.86%	0.96%	2,621	-13.98%	5.56%	58	-26.58%	-3.33%
123	124	Reno, NV	$249,000	24.56%	5.53%	2,512	-24.63%	7.72%	61	-34.41%	-6.15%
124	122	Lexington, KY	$159,900	-3.09%	0.00%	4,498	-5.92%	0.36%	78	-15.22%	0.00%
125	130	Tallahassee, FL	$155,000	1.48%	0.00%	2,185	-6.26%	1.96%	95	-11.21%	-4.04%
126	126	West-AZ-RSA	$269,700	8.31%	-1.93%	2,134	-11.16%	5.75%	80	-20.79%	2.56%
127	127	South Bend, IN	$99,900	-2.73%	0.00%	1,799	-13.92%	2.27%	73	-23.96%	-5.19%
128	129	Springfield, IL	$119,900	-4.00%	1.31%	1,391	9.18%	2.88%	78	8.33%	6.85%
129	132	Macon, GA	$129,000	-2.27%	-0.69%	2,556	-3.58%	3.23%	94	-6.00%	5.62%
130	133	El Paso, TX	$153,000	2.01%	2.03%	3,863	8.60%	1.60%	88	-7.37%	0.00%
131	128	Chattanooga, TN-GA(TN)	$183,000	-1.03%	0.27%	2,909	-1.36%	2.43%	90	-15.09%	2.27%
132	117	Roanoke, VA	$169,900	-2.91%	0.00%	2,116	-1.40%	6.55%	81	-11.96%	10.96%
133	134	Norfolk-Virginia Bch-Newport News, VA-NC(VA)	$229,000	-0.39%	0.66%	11,919	-0.96%	4.76%	81	-14.74%	3.85%
134	131	Columbia, MO	$174,900	3.24%	0.58%	965	-14.60%	-0.92%	61	-16.44%	7.02%
135	135	Gainesville, FL	$154,900	1.31%	0.58%	1,961	-3.97%	2.67%	100	-16.67%	2.04%
136	137	Punta Gorda, FL	$189,000	2.19%	-5.45%	2,462	1.74%	-7.79%	109	-12.80%	-5.22%
137	136	Ocala, FL	$129,000	0.58%	-0.77%	3,531	11.28%	2.47%	104	-11.11%	-0.95%
138	138	Portland-Vancouver, OR-WA(WA)	$269,000	8.95%	3.99%	2,310	-15.97%	5.67%	71	-33.02%	10.94%
139	142	Salem, OR	$214,950	10.29%	2.41%	2,357	-9.31%	3.56%	86	-13.13%	7.50%
140	139	Anchorage, AK	$296,000	4.96%	-2.95%	1,107	-13.04%	13.77%	39	-13.33%	2.63%
141	140	Huntsville, AL	$179,900	-2.49%	0.00%	4,708	5.85%	0.32%	104	4.00%	4.00%
142	143	Santa Fe, NM	$389,900	-2.28%	0.23%	2,084	10.21%	13.82%	106	-23.19%	3.92%
143	144	Iowa City, IA	$210,450	6.29%	0.21%	1,108	-10.36%	-6.97%	74	-19.57%	5.71%
144	141	Fayetteville, NC	$149,000	-0.60%	-0.67%	2,644	2.01%	3.36%	103	1.98%	5.10%
145	145	Cedar Rapids, IA	$144,900	-2.42%	0.00%	1,411	-9.32%	2.25%	67	-16.25%	4.69%
146	146	Pueblo, CO	$148,500	9.27%	-0.93%	1,030	0.78%	5.32%	72	-8.86%	-2.70%